STG-2000 vs GeForce 9600 GSO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1215not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.71no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG92NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2008 (18 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt2 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.400.08
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs121
TMUs481
L2 Cache48 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm168 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amount384 MB1 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIHDTV1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)1.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2008 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 2 Watt

9600 GSO has an age advantage of 12 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 669% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 5150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 91 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO or STG-2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.