ATI Radeon X1650 XT vs GeForce 9600 GSO
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1206 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.09 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.70 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | G92 | RV560 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 April 2008 (17 years ago) | 30 October 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 525 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 330 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 4.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.264 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 12 | 8 |
| TMUs | 48 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 48 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| SLI options | 2-way | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 28 April 2008 | 30 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 55 Watt |
9600 GSO has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.
ATI X1650 XT, on the other hand, has 90.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO and Radeon X1650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
