UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameG94Tiger Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48128
Core clock speed650 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.6011.60
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile has a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 12 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.