Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG94Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483584 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors505 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.60224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs24224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2008 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 230 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has 156% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 65 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.