GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG94GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48960
Core clock speed650 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors505 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.6087.84
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1624
TMUs2480
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 150 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 160 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.