Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs GeForce 9500M GE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MVega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2008 (18 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243584
Core clock speedno data1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data291.4
Floating-point processing powerno data9.326 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2008 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

9500M GE has 380% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GE or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.