ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs GeForce 9500M GE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MRV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2008 (18 years ago)23 January 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24120
Core clock speedno data725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data378 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.174 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

9500M GE has 160% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3650 AGP, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and Radeon HD 3650 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3650 AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GE or Radeon HD 3650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.