ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP vs GeForce 9500M GE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MRS880
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2008 (18 years ago)1 May 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2440
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2008 1 May 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 9 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4225 IGP has an age advantage of 2 years, a 18% more advanced lithography process, and 178% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GE or Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.