Radeon R7 M365 vs GeForce 9500M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameG96Litho
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data960 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.00023.04
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops60no data
ROPs88
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.1Not Listed
VulkanN/A-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

R7 M365 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M G and Radeon R7 M365. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M G is a notebook card while Radeon R7 M365 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9500M G
AMD Radeon R7 M365
Radeon R7 M365

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9500M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.