ATI FireGL V3200 vs GeForce 940MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Power efficiency12.07no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM107RV380
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed795 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed861 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate27.552.000
Floating-point processing power0.8817 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2016 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 46 Watt

GeForce 940MX has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940MX and FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940MX is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V3200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GeForce 940MX
ATI FireGL V3200
FireGL V3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2468 votes

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940MX or FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.