ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs GeForce 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking858not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.21no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGM108RV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)7 December 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1029 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate17.981.000
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 24 Watt

GeForce 940A has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050 AGP, on the other hand, has 38% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Radeon X1050 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1050 AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940A or Radeon X1050 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.