Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.12no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM108Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1029 MHz1096 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98140.3
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs16128
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce 940A has 263.6% lower power consumption.

Pro 575, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GeForce 940A
AMD Radeon Pro 575
Radeon Pro 575

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940A or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.