GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM108GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed1029 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate17.984.160
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.01.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 31 Watt

GeForce 940A has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 6.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GeForce 940A
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 78 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940A or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.