Arc 140V Mobile vs GeForce 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.12no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGM108Lunar Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1029 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98124.8
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 37 Watt

GeForce 940A has 12.1% lower power consumption.

Arc 140V Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Arc 140V Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GeForce 940A
Intel Arc 140V Mobile
Arc 140V Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Arc 140V Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940A or Arc 140V Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.