Radeon Instinct MI355X vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameC79CDNA Next
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616384
Core clock speed580 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors314 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt1400 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6402,457.6
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS78.64 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs81024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared288 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.19 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 1400 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 11566.7% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI355X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X
Radeon Instinct MI355X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 52 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Instinct MI355X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Radeon Instinct MI355X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.