ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.53no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameC79M9+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165
Core clock speed580 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors314 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.6400.8
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

GeForce 9400M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and Mobility Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Mobility Radeon 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Mobility Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.