Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.51
Power efficiencyno data13.74
Architectureno dataRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 December 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242304
Core clock speedno data1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data205 Watt
Texture fill rateno data293.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.4 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 11 December 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Pro W5700X has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and Radeon Pro W5700X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or Radeon Pro W5700X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.