GRID K100 vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24192
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

GRID K100 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and GRID K100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while GRID K100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or GRID K100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.