A10G vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.69
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores249216
Core clock speedno data1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data492.5
Floating-point processing powerno data31.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data9 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

A10G has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and A10G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while A10G is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.