Tesla P100 DGXS vs GeForce 9400M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1405not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameC79GP100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)5 April 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163584
Core clock speed450 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors314 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600331.5
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared715 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data732.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 5 April 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 300 Watt

9400M G has 2400% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 DGXS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M G and Tesla P100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M G is a notebook card while Tesla P100 DGXS is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.