Radeon R9 370X vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.86no data
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMCP79MXTrinidad
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)27 August 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed450 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data82.40
Floating-point processing powerno data2.637 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 27 August 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 180 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1400% lower power consumption.

R9 370X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon R9 370X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 370X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 91 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon R9 370X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.