ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon IGP 320M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
9400M (G) / ION (LE) outperforms IGP 320M by a whopping 2800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1385 | 1583 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.86 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | MCP79MX | RS100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 October 2008 (17 years ago) | 5 October 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 2 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 160 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 160 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 282 Million | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 0.16 |
| ROPs | no data | 1 |
| TMUs | no data | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Escape from Tarkov, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9400M (G) / ION (LE) performs better in 14 tests (67%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (33%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.29 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 14 October 2008 | 5 October 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
9400M (G) / ION (LE) has a 2800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
