ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.86no data
Architectureno dataRage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameMCP79MXRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)14 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million36 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.100
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.08.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 14 March 2004
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has an age advantage of 4 years, a 131% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.