CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.86no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164480
Core clock speed450 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,493 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 250 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.