ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP vs GeForce 9400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameC79RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 June 2008 (17 years ago)17 July 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16320
Core clock speed450 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors314 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60024.00
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 8x
Lengthno data193 mm
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2008 17 July 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 59 Watt

GeForce 9400 has an age advantage of 11 months, and 47.5% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4670 AGP, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 and Radeon HD 4670 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400
GeForce 9400
ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 or Radeon HD 4670 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.