Radeon Pro 575X vs GeForce 9400 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1297not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG96CPolaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 August 2008 (17 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed550 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors314 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.400140.3
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2008 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

9400 GT has 140% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 522 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT or Radeon Pro 575X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.