ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGT218R423
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)1 December 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed589 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors260 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt54 Watt
Texture fill rate4.7127.600
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 1 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 54 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

ATI X800 XT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.