Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.19
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)15 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed589 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.712164.8
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and Radeon Pro 5600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.