Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.30
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGT218G71
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)24 April 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed589 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate4.71212.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416 ×2
TMUs824 ×2
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed600 MHz605 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s38.72 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 24 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 145 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 190% lower power consumption.

FX 4500 X2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and Quadro FX 4500 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4500 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2
Quadro FX 4500 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4500 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or Quadro FX 4500 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.