GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition vs 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGT218GM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16640
Core clock speed589 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors260 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.71244.96
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.25.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has 50% lower power consumption.

GTX 950M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.