GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs 9400 GT Rev. 3

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218C78
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed589 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate4.7124.000
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.