Quadro NVS 420 vs GeForce 9400 GT PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data0.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG96CG98
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 August 2008 (17 years ago)20 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$131.43

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168 ×2
Core clock speed550 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors314 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4004.400 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs44 ×2
TMUs88 ×2
L2 Cache32 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed400 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s11.2 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2008 20 January 2009
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

9400 GT PCI has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 420, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT PCI and Quadro NVS 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT PCI is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 420 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Quadro NVS 420

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT PCI or Quadro NVS 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.