ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8041602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.78no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM108RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (9 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842
Core clock speed952 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.480.37
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs242
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1278
+63800%
Samples: 1431
ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 15 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 10 no data
Far Cry 5 11 no data
Fortnite 37 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 5 12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
Valorant 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+544%
9−10
−544%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
Escape from Tarkov 9 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Fortnite 15 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12 no data
Metro Exodus 2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Valorant 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 33
+371%
7−8
−371%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 30−33 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Escape from Tarkov 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce 930MX surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 21 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2016 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GeForce 930MX has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 930MX and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 477 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930MX or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.