A100 SXM4 vs GeForce 930A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking819not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.78no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM108GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846912
Core clock speed928 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed941 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate22.58609.1
Floating-point processing power0.7227 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache192 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount2 GB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.08.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 400 Watt

GeForce 930A has 1112.1% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 930A and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 930A is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930A
GeForce 930A
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce 930A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930A or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.