RTX A4 Mobile vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG98GA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed550 MHz1297 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.400113.3
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache16 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

RTX A4 Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and RTX A4 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 174 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or RTX A4 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.