GeForce2 MX 200 LP vs GeForce 9300M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG98NV11 B3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed550 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors210 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.4000.7
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

9300M GS has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and GeForce2 MX 200 LP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX 200 LP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or GeForce2 MX 200 LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.