Arc Pro A50 vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1398not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG98DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)8 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed550 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400150.4
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 75 Watt

9300M GS has 476.9% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or Arc Pro A50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.