ATI All-In-Wonder HD vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG98RV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8120
Core clock speed550 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors210 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4005.776
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s19.01 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 55 Watt

9300M GS has 323.1% lower power consumption.

ATI All-In-Wonder HD, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and All-In-Wonder HD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or All-In-Wonder HD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.