Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs GeForce 9300M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1447not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.19no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG86Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16512
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1101 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20035.23
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2008 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 35 Watt

9300M G has 169.2% lower power consumption.

Vega 8 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M G and Radeon Vega 8 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Vega 8 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 179 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M G or Radeon Vega 8 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.