GeForce GT 645 OEM vs 9300M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1446not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.18no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG86GF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16288
Core clock speed400 MHz776 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt102 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20037.25
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.894 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cache16 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz957 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s91.87 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2008 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 102 Watt

9300M G has 684.6% lower power consumption.

GT 645 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M G and GeForce GT 645 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 645 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
GeForce GT 645 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M G or GeForce GT 645 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.