Radeon 530X Mobile vs GeForce 9300 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1461not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG98Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speed540 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32024.58
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

530X Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300 SE and Radeon 530X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300 SE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 530X Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300 SE or Radeon 530X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.