NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparison of GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620 architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
23.83 GTexel / s
25.2 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
14.4 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GeForce 920MX 1.47 +15.7%
HD Graphics 620 1.27
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
GeForce 920MX 110110 +39.3%
HD Graphics 620 79067
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeForce 920MX 9114 +18%
HD Graphics 620 7725
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GeForce 920MX 1337 +55.8%
HD Graphics 620 858
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GeForce 920MX 1448 +55%
HD Graphics 620 934
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GeForce 920MX 1835 +21.6%
HD Graphics 620 1509
3DMark Vantage Performance
GeForce 920MX 7408 +27.7%
HD Graphics 620 5803
GeForce 920MX 1092 +16.8%
HD Graphics 620 935
Let's see how good GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
15.7% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (256 vs 192)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision Surround
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
Somewhat newer (30 August 2016 vs 25 March 2016)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 16 watts)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
So, 920MX or HD Graphics 620?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce 920MX.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce 920MX and HD Graphics 620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.