Radeon Graphics 128SP vs GeForce 920M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking979not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.98no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208BRaphael
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed954 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors915 million3,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5317.60
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs328
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cache32 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 128SP has an age advantage of 7 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920M and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 128SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1508 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920M or Radeon Graphics 128SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.