GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs 920M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking914not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.86no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK208BGK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed954 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors915 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5328.86
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data115 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce 920M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8, on the other hand, has 32% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920M and GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1319 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.