Tesla K40t vs GeForce 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking935not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.61no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK208BGK110B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842880
Core clock speed954 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors915 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53210.2
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs32240
L1 Cache32 KB240 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.53.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 245 Watt

GeForce 920A has an age advantage of 1 year, and 642.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40t, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920A and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
NVIDIA Tesla K40t
Tesla K40t

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40t on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or Tesla K40t, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.