HD Graphics P5700 vs GeForce 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking852not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.55no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGK208BBroadwell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed954 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5324.00
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.80
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 920A has an age advantage of 6 months.

HD Graphics P5700, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920A and HD Graphics P5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook card while HD Graphics P5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
Intel HD Graphics P5700
HD Graphics P5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate HD Graphics P5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.