GMA 900 vs GeForce 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking928not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.62no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 3.0 (2005)
GPU code nameGK208BAlviso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed954 MHz333 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.531.332
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8FSB

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

GeForce 920A has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920A and GMA 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
Intel GMA 900
GMA 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 29 votes

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or GMA 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.