GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 vs 9200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1346not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.15no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameC79G96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors314 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6008.000
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce 9200M has an age advantage of 2 months, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

9500 GS Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M and GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.