CMP 50HX vs GeForce 9200M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1268not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.15no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC79TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)24 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163584
Core clock speed450 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors314 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600296.6
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data560.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 24 June 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 9200M has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M is a notebook card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 43 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.