B200 SXM 192 GB vs GeForce 9200M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1284not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.15no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameC79GB100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616896 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1837 MHz
Number of transistors314 million208,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs424 ×2
TMUs8528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 1000 Watt

GeForce 9200M has 8233.3% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M is a notebook card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 47 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or B200 SXM 192 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.